Federal Judge: Suit to Stop NYPD Street Body Scanners Must Wait

nypdscanOn January 28th of this year, I filed the first and only lawsuit against the NYPD’s testing and planned implementation of “street body scanners” — terahertz imaging devices designed to allow cops to peer under the clothes of unsuspecting passersby on the street for guns. In addition to highlighting New York’s longstanding disrespect for the Second Amendment by assuming that anyone bearing arms must be doing so illegally, this tool plainly ignores the Fourth Amendment’s requirement, made clear in Terry v. Ohio, that searches must have cause. By checking underneath the clothing of the public at random, the NYPD proposes to conduct the most widespread and general search ever demanded (outside of the airport checkpoint, of course).

U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe ruled today, however, that the suit must wait because the immanency and effects of the NYPD’s proposed scanner use are, at this time, uncertain and speculative. This issue touches a gray area where, on the one hand, courts are allowed to protect the people from imminent loss of liberty, they must balance this against the constitutional requirement that only a live controversy may be reviewed.

The facts of this matter are that: 1) the NYPD has paid millions of dollars to fund the development of these devices, 2) the NYPD has procured at least one of these devices, and 3) NYPD Commissioner Kelly has stated his intent to begin use of the devices as soon as possible.

I think reasonable people could disagree as to whether this constitutes a situation where a constitutional injury is imminent, and it is, of course, no surprise that any benefit of the doubt be sent the government’s way by a federal judge. As of now, I don’t plan on appealing this ruling, but instead watching for the first sign that the NYPD has brought these machines into public, at which point I will move to re-open the case. Let the NYPD be on notice: if you start to scan the public, you will be sued on Day 1.

Corbett v. City of New York II – Dismissed (.pdf)

20 thoughts on “Federal Judge: Suit to Stop NYPD Street Body Scanners Must Wait

Add yours

    1. When people said they’d stop flying to avoid the TSA, they found the TSA in train and bus stations. What will you do when the nude machines move from NYC to other cities (and they will)? Avoid all cities?

      1. A great point. The reason that I hit the NYPD’s scanners so early is that by the time anyone (including myself) took action on the TSA’s scanners, they had already spread everywhere. It’s important to put the government on notice **right away** that they have headed down the wrong path.

    1. Yep. I don’t weigh in on the safety issues regarding scanners, since I don’t want to cloud my argument that the privacy issues alone are sufficient to ban them. But, I think people have certainly raised legitimate concerns.

  1. $7 Billion dollars in DHS grants include wasteful police costs:

    U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) today released an oversight report, “Safety at Any Price: Assessing the Impact of Homeland Security Spending in U.S. Cities.” The report is based on a year-long investigation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grant programs and the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI).
    http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public//index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=b86fdaeb-86ff-4d19-a112-415ec85aa9b6

    A decade long, $7-billion federal program to help local police and fire departments prepare for a terrorist attack has allowed communities to buy millions of dollars worth of equipment that goes unused or is unrelated to terrorism, according to a new report.

    Since 2003, a Department of Homeland Security grant program called the Urban Areas Security Initiative (http://www.fema.gov/fy-2012-homeland-security-grant-program) has ballooned from 12 major metropolitan areas to 31 jurisdictions. The study found that some cities and towns had created implausible attack scenarios to win federal grants, and had scrambled at the end of each fiscal year to buy extra, unnecessary gadgets to spend excess cash.
    http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2012/12/7-billion-dollars-in-homeland-security.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: