Court Refuses to Hear International Security Interviews Lawsuit; TSA Ramps Up Domestic Version

Last month, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals abruptly terminated my case against the TSA’s international security interview program, wherein the TSA forces US-flagged airlines to interview their passengers before they return to the U.S.  Their reason?  I asked for an injunction (forcing them to stop or modify the program), and the court ruled that I can’t prove that I will be subject to it again, and therefore I lack standing.  The rationale for this interpretation of standing comes from a case over 30 years ago where the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that a black man who was choked out by the L.A.P.D., nearly to death, during a traffic stop still could not seek an injunction against the chokehold policy, despite proving that the L.A.P.D. had a widespread practice of chokeholds, that they were regularly deadly, and and that he was a victim of the policy.   Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983).

Lyons was a bad ruling, and I’m not certain the court would make the same decision today given its trend against rubber stamping blatant racial discrimination, but importantly, it ruled that while Mr. Lyons could not sue for an injunction, he could indeed sue for money, so I’ll get to renew my case as a request for money damages.  If I win even a trivial amount, the TSA would have to stop the program, because then thousands of passengers daily could sue for that trivial amount.  Even $100 would do, given that about 2 million passengers would be able to sue every moth by my calculations.  So, I shall proceed in that direction.

In the meantime, as I noted before, the case is already won, because it forced the TSA to: 1) publicly disclose the existence of the program, which had been previously described nowhere on the public Internet, and 2) state in open court that it wouldn’t force travelers to participate in the program with a threat of denied boarding, which is what I encountered.  I continue the lawsuit because the TSA needs to direct the airlines to stop the practice of threatening denied boarding, which it has thus far refused (at least publicly) to do.

With that said, I received an e-mail from a woman this weekend who said she was questioned at a gate for a domestic flight:

In Tulsa yesterday, three [uniformed TSA screeners] fanned out among people waiting AT THE GATES and began interrogations.  They asked EVERYONE up and down my concourse, “Are these your bags?  (Yes) Do you have any others? (No) Did you check any?  (No)  Where are you going? (Charlotte) After Chicago, where are you going?  (I’m not going to Chicago, I’m going to Charlotte.) Okay after Charlotte, where are you going?  (Portland)  Portland Oregon or Portland Maine?  (Y’all are scaring me.  Is something going on here?  What’s up?)  We have to talk to everybody.  Portland Oregon or Portland Maine?  (Maine)

[It was American Airlines, the gates near A5, Saturday, August 6, waiting for a 1:40 pm flight to Portland Maine, after a flight to Chicago had taken off from the same gate.]

This is likely an extension of the SPOT program, the largely discredited waste of taxpayer dollars by which the TSA thinks its poorly-trained screeners can pick out terrorists just by looking at and talking with them.  Please remember that you have no obligation to answer their questions, and although there may be additional screening, they cannot deny you boarding for remaining silent.

Corbett v. TSA III – Appeal Dismissed (.pdf)

PS – Delta, you suck.  7 hours of scheduled flying became 14 today because you still use a computer system designed during the Reagan administration.

17 thoughts on “Court Refuses to Hear International Security Interviews Lawsuit; TSA Ramps Up Domestic Version

Add yours

  1. INTERPOL Facial Images Best Practices Guide:

    In 2015 INTERPOL will introduce a facial recognition system to further enhance its forensics capabilities to its members countries. In this context the images used to populate the facial database as well as to submit for facial query be of a high quality in order to ensure consistent match performance.

    The purpose of this document is to recommend a simple set up for taking frontal face (mugshot) images.

    Different cameras will obviously produce different results but there are other important factors to take into consideration which can have a big impact on the effectiveness of facial recognition software.


  2. DEA profiled random people at nearly every major airport and train station across the country!

    In 10 years, US drug agents have seized nearly $210 million from 5,200 Americans at airports and Amtrak train stations. Federal agents allegedly collected private data from paid informants, but only two people were real suspects.

    The DEA profiled random people at nearly every major US airline at 15 airports and Amtrak train across the country.


  3. TSA Steals Innocent Passenger’s Money And Keeps A Percentage After DOJ Orders All Money Returned:

    A year and a half later — after she produced paperwork showing that much of the money had indeed come from her boyfriend’s retirement fund — the Justice Department agreed to return the money, minus $4,000.

    A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s office in Detroit, Gina Balaya, said prosecutors concluded that “a small percentage of the funds should be forfeited.”

    “It was outrageous. It’s still outrageous,” Hall said.

  4. Special Report: Biometrics and Border Security

  5. I agree Delta’s archaic computer system needs to go. They should have kept Northwest ‘s. Better yet, the politicians should never have allowed all those mergers!

  6. Tech slams Homeland Security on social media (spying) screening:

    The Internet Association, said the government’s draft rule would grant customs officials unprecedented access to foreigners’ private lives, since users often post sensitive details — from their political beliefs to their sexuality — on social media pages. It could also cause trouble for U.S. travelers if other countries follow Washington’s lead, the group argued.

    “Should the U.S. Government advance with the DHS proposal it is probable that other countries will make similar requests of visitors entering their country, including U.S. citizens,” the companies wrote in comments to the agency. “This will be true for democratic and non-democratic countries alike, including those that do not have the same human rights and due process standards as the U.S.”


  7. US Customs & Border Patrol shared too much personally identifiable information:

    “We believe the manner in which CBP OPR shared the sensitive PII showed a lack of regard for, and may have compromised these individuals’ privacy,” according to the report. “We attribute this to CBP OPR’s general belief that accomplishing its law enforcement mission takes precedence over its responsibility to protect individuals’ privacy.”

    READ the REPORT…

    Click to access OIG-16-123-Aug16.pdf

Leave a Reply to Jonathan Corbett Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: