The TSA announced an “exciting” “new” program that it’s trialing in MSP airport in Minnesota:
After a explosives-detection dog sniffs passengers for traces of explosives, travelers can then move through expedited screening like the Precheck program, where they can leave on shoes and light coats, and leave laptops and small containers of liquids in their carry-on bags.
“You’ll see them snaking up and down the line,” Neffenger said of the canine teams. “I’m very excited about getting extra teams here.”
In other words, passengers that pass a dog skip the body scanner and go through a metal detector. This is exactly what I’ve been asking the TSA to do since the very beginning, because:
- Dogs are by far cheaper than the body scanners. A body scanner costs $300,000, functions for less than a decade, and requires significantly more man-hours per
passenger than a dog, which may cost low-5 figures to train and a couple bucks a day in food.
- Dogs are by far tougher to beat than the body scanners. The fact of the matter is that if you’ve been working with explosives, you likely have traces of it all over your body, and you’re likely not fooling Rover, while in 2012 I proved that beating the body scanners takes no more than a sewing kit.
- Dogs are far less invasive than the body scanners. These dogs are trained to detect explosives only, while a body scanner is set to alert on anything on your body, including medical devices, scars, hygiene products, your baggie of weed, etc. Dogs are a targeted search only for the stuff the TSA should actually be looking for.
Instead of spending nearly $2B by now on technology that people hate because they are slow, invasive, and emit poorly-studied radiation… instead of fighting tons of legal battles… instead of making them perhaps the most hated federal agency on the planet… they could have just done this 5 years ago.
Let’s hope their pilot program goes well and the body scanners are relegated, along with a pat-down option, to those who fail Fido’s nose.