TSA, Having Lost Immunity in Four Courts of Appeals, Tries Again Twice More

TSA loves arguing that it’s exempt from Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) lawsuits based on the misconduct of its checkpoint screeners. The text of the FTCA states that it only applies to intentional misconduct when committed by an “officer of the United States who is empowered by law to execute searches, to seize evidence, or to make arrests for violations of Federal law,” and TSA argues that checkpoint screening isn’t really “executing searches.” Given that the FTCA is the only viable way to redress checkpoint abuse in the courts, it’s no wonder that they give serious effort to this strategy despite it requiring… er, linguistical creativity… to say that TSA screeners don’t search.

Every U.S. Court of Appeals to hear the matter and come up with a precedential ruling — four so far — has ruled against them. I argued two of them that were decided last year (Osmon in the Fourth Circuit, Leuthauser in the Ninth) and the Third and Eighth Circuits took the same path in 2019 and 2020, respectively. But, there are twelve federal circuits that hear general appeals and a decision of one of them is only binding within the states covered by that particular circuit, so unless the Supreme Court takes up the matter, TSA is free to give all twelve circuits a try. If TSA wins in one of them, it can use that as a reason to persuade the Supreme Court to hear the case (lawyers call this a “circuit split”).

So try they do. In March, I’ll be doing oral arguments in Mengert v. U.S., on behalf of a woman who was subject to a back-room strip search by TSA screeners (TSA rules categorically prohibit their screeners from conducting strip searches for any reason). TSA lost on the FTCA issue in the lower court and is now raising it in the Tenth Circuit. TSA also tried again in a Florida federal district court in Koletas v. U.S., and prevailed on the FTCA issue in that trial court. That Florida ruling rubber-stamped TSA’s argument without even mentioning the Third, Fourth, Eighth, and Ninth circuit rulings, which is pretty outrageous even for Florida. We filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit.

So in summary:

  • First Circuit – No Decision
  • Second Circuit – No Decision
  • Third Circuit – TSA Lost (Pellegrino, 2019)
  • Fourth Circuit – TSA Lost (Osmon, 2023)
  • Fifth Circuit – No Decision
  • Sixth Circuit – No Decision
  • Seventh Circuit – No Decision
  • Eighth Circuit – TSA Lost (Iverson, 2020)
  • Ninth Circuit – TSA Lost (Leuthauser, 2023)
  • Tenth Circuit – Oral Arguments in March 2024 (Mengert)
  • Eleventh Circuit – Oral Arguments Likely Winter 2024 (Koletas)
  • DC Circuit – No Decision

3 thoughts on “TSA, Having Lost Immunity in Four Courts of Appeals, Tries Again Twice More

Add yours

  1. Why does the TSA waste taxpayers money on that? Why not just say worry, we were wrong, won’t do that again? I just don’t get it.

    1. I think many of my clients (against TSA or otherwise) would not have sued had they just been given a proper apology in the first place. None of my TSA clients have ever been given an apology.

      1. Hi Jonathan,

        Glad to see you still at it. Maybe one day the TSA will do things a better way that doesn’t include violating people. 

        By the way, you need to update the copyright line on the bottom right of the page. It still shows 2023 for the year. Like this:

        Copyright © 2010 – 2023 Jonathan Corbett

        Keep up the good work. :-) 

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑